🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the country’s government ministers asks for measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a pending law that include lowering the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulation among public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

It comes amid expanded apprehension about industry interference with health policies. Last month, global health authorities raised concerns that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of business advocacy everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “following international recommended threshold”, delayed for at least one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the company executive of the Zambian branch claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We exist in a connected world. If I plant tobacco in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator said: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, noting that young individuals should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to accomplish desired population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, adding that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which includes growing volumes of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.