🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where African descendants are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the celebration is commemorated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the United States, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to erase Black history and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how little it can be influential if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month entirely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the threats that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and reactive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.